Level Measurement – The Basics

When it comes to the measurement of levels in a laboratory, there are a number of different methods that can be used including the hydrostatic pressure, the dynamic level, and the permeability test. In most cases, these three measurements are performed using the same equipment, but there are instances when a distinction needs to be made between the different measurements. This article will briefly discuss some of the different types of level measurement and how they are best utilized. Read more – https://www.semrad.com.au/products/level-transmitters-level-measurement

Level Measurement

The hydrostatic pressure is one type of level measurement where a constant pressure is applied to a fixed mass or object and the distance between the points of low pressure and high pressure is determined. This method measures the level of liquid and other solids and fluids that display an upper to lower surface pressure. The distance between these two categories is called the level measurement’s interface. A continuous vessel level measurement on the other hand is performed when a measuring vessel is completely filled with water. During this measurement, a continuous flow of fluid is measured, and the measurement of the volume of the fluid is taken over the course of a period of time, which is called a recording time.

While these two different types of level measurement are just a few examples, there are many other types of level measurement that may be utilized in the scientific and engineering fields. Some of these include the mechanical parallelism method, the hydrometer, the electrical conductivity meter, the hydrometer probe, and the gas flow meter. Each of these different types of level measurement has its own advantages as well as disadvantages, so it is important to understand them before selecting the method that is best suited for the measurement process that is being performed. Some examples of these types of devices include ultrasonic level sensors, gas gauge, electrical conductivity meters, and gas flow meters.

Level Switch, Transmitter & Measurement SEMRAD

27e/1-3 Endeavour Rd, Caringbah NSW 2229

(02) 9531 8474

Home

Read More →

Disposable Face Masks – More Effective Than Traditional Methods?

Disposable face masks have become a common part of many workplaces in the Western world. Although, disposable face masks have been around for quite some time and are used regularly, recent research has shown that there are several health benefits to using disposable face masks. Compared with using an anti-fungal mask as prevention against mold and mildew, researchers have found that disposable face masks significantly reduced the number of days worked by each worker suffering from colds and coughs. Also, when used daily, disposable face masks significantly shortened the length of time workers wore doctor-prescribed “medications” meant to relieve respiratory tract symptoms. Furthermore, when used on a regular basis throughout the workweek, disposable face masks were shown to prevent or reduce the number of days workers wore doctor-prescribed pain relievers.

The Ultimate Deal On Disposable Face Masks

Using disposable face masks has also been shown to be more effective in containing infectious diseases such as hepatitis B, HIV, and anthrax compared to using standard masks. Among other infectious diseases, respiratory viruses, such as the varicella-zoster virus and the herpes simplex virus, are often most easily spread through the use of contaminated equipment. As a result, workers who frequently use disposable masks have been shown to contract a greater number of respiratory viruses, making the workplace much more dangerous for those with respiratory problems. While it is impossible to completely eliminate all sources of exposure to infectious disease, using appropriate safety equipment can substantially reduce the risk of spreading potentially harmful pathogens.

Another study published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology revealed that among hospitals treating patients with cancer and other life threatening diseases, the use of disposable face masks was far more effective in reducing hospital acquired infections compared to the use of standard mask covers. Among the most notable benefits of these findings was the fact that none of the study’s participants developed any form of allergic reaction to the disinfection method. The treatment process lasted for an average of eighteen hours, which was a considerable amount of time when compared to the duration of using traditional medical practices. This achievement is most likely due to the fact that the medical experts employed green disinfectant based solutions, making them far less irritating to the skin than other types of cleansers.

Read More →